![]() |
The Levels of Teacher and Teacher-Librarian Collaboration: A graphic I adapted from Montiel-Overall’s findings. |
The ultimate role
of a teacher-librarian (TL) is to help students learn and enjoy learning. They
are the guardians, facilitators, and instructors of knowledge. They help
students. Yet, to be most effective in helping students, they can partner with teachers
to share their knowledge of resources, technology, research skills, and teaching
skills, either in the library or in the classroom. They can also work with
admin and teachers to develop across-curriculum planned instruction. Using
Latham and Gross’s overview of Montiel-Overall’s findings, as well as her own,
I have broken down four levels of teacher and teacher-librarian (TL) collaboration:
1.
Co-ordinator: The first, and most basic, form of
collaboration between a TL and a teacher is the TL co-ordinating resources, activities,
and events for a class. This can include hosting book fairs, doing STEM
activities, sharing and displaying student work, showing where resources are
and how to use them, and having time allocated for student drop-in use. The TL
doesn’t necessarily even have to communicate with the teacher to provide this
level of class help, which is why I encourage teacher-librarians to extend collaboration
with teachers to the next levels.
2.
Resource locator: This next step actually requires at least some
basic communication with teachers, either by the teacher approaching the TL to
find resources (physical or digital) to either help them prepare a unit or to
prepare a presentation of resources for students to use in a research project, or by the TL’s conversations with the
teacher to discover whether they could help them in any way by providing
resources. It is crucially important for TL’s not to assume a teacher will approach
them for help, as not all teachers consider this option; TL’s will likely need
to take the initiative by offering this support and may need to build trust
with the teacher first; level 1 support will help build this trust.
3.
Co-instructor: This level requires even more communication
with teachers, to the extent of working with them to co-develop a lesson, unit,
or assignment. In this scenario, a TL’s technological and research skills are
specifically utilized for goals planned, presented, and possibly even assessed
by both the teacher and TL.
4.
Across-Curriculum Co-Instructor: This, the most
advanced, level requires support and co-ordination with the admin (for
allocated planning time and involvement) and participation with every teacher in the school. At this
level, the degrees and levels of technological and research skills, planned
co-instruction, and level 1 and 2 support are worked out across every grade
taught at the school, and, naturally, the teachers and admin should extend this
opportunity to clarify what curricular content is taught at each level for
split-grade classes. TL’s may need to take the initiative in planning this with
their admin. This level also requires an ethos of school-wide teacher/admin
collaboration, trust, and commitment, which, unfortunately, doesn’t necessarily
exist in every school. At the very least, the TL can do what they can to slowly
change this ethos through effective collaboration at levels 1 through 3 until
the spirit of school collaboration catches on to allow this level to move
forward (by leading by example).
References
Latham, Don, and Melissa Gross. “Collaborating
for Success: Teachers and Librarians as Partners in Learning.” Voices From the Middle, vol. 24, no. 4,
2017, p. 64-66.
Montiel-Overall, Patricia. “Teacher and
Teacher-Librarian Collaboration: Moving toward Integration.” Teacher Librarian, vol. 34, no. 2,
2006, p. 28-31.
Very good post but from only one angle. It is easy to follow that model. I agree that building trust and relationship is essential to narrow the teacher's needs. Cheers
ReplyDelete